Avi Cherry created KAFKA-14260:
----------------------------------
Summary: InMemoryKeyValueStore iterator still throws
ConcurrentModificationException
Key: KAFKA-14260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14260
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
Components: streams
Affects Versions: 3.2.3
Reporter: Avi Cherry
This is the same bug as KAFKA-7912 which was then re-introduced by KAFKA-8802.
Any iterator returned from {{InMemoryKeyValueStore}} may end up throwing a
ConcurrentModificationException because the backing map is not concurrent safe.
I expect that this only happens when the store is retrieved from
{{KafkaStreams.store()}} from outside of the topology since any usage of the
store from inside of the topology should be naturally single-threaded.
To start off, a reminder that this behaviour explicitly violates the interface
contract for {{ReadOnlyKeyValueStore}} which states
{quote}The returned iterator must be safe from
java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions
{quote}
It is often complicated to make code to demonstrate concurrency bugs, but
thankfully it is trivial to reason through the source code in
{{InMemoryKeyValueStore.java}} to show why this happens:
* All of the InMemoryKeyValueStore methods that return iterators do so by
passing a keySet based on the backing TreeMap to the InMemoryKeyValueIterator
constructor.
* These keySets are all VIEWS of the backing map, not copies.
* The InMemoryKeyValueIterator then makes a private copy of the keySet by
passing the original keySet into the constructor for TreeSet. This copying was
implemented in KAFKA-8802, incorrectly intending it to fix the concurrency
problem.
* TreeSet then iterates over the keySet to make a copy. If the original
backing TreeMap in InMemoryKeyValueStore is changed while this copy is being
created it will fail-fast a ConcurrentModificationException.
This bug should be able to be trivially fixed by replacing the backing TreeMap
with a ConcurrentSkipListMap but here's the rub:
This bug has already been found in KAFKA-7912 and the TreeMap was replaced with
a ConcurrentSkipListMap. It was then reverted back to a TreeMap in KAFKA-8802
because of the performance regression. I can [see from one of the
PRs|https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7212/commits/384c12e40f3a59591f897d916f92253e126820ed]
that it was believed the concurrency problem with the TreeMap implementation
was fixed by copying the keyset when the iterator is created but the problem
remains, plus the fix creates an extra copy of the iterated portion of the set
in memory.
For what it's worth, the performance difference between TreeMap and
ConcurrentSkipListMap do not extend into complexity. TreeMap enjoys a similar
~2x speed through all operations with any size of data, but at the cost of what
turned out to be an easy-to-encounter bug.
This is all unfortunate since the only time the state stores ever get accessed
concurrently is through the `KafkaStreams.store()` mechanism, but I would
imagine that "correct and slightly slower) is better than "incorrect and
faster".
Too bad BoilerBay's AirConcurrentMap is closed-source and patented.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)