dimitarndimitrov commented on code in PR #13432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13432#discussion_r1170905273


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/admin/internals/ListOffsetsHandler.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.internals;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Optional;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.ListOffsetsOptions;
+import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.ListOffsetsResult.ListOffsetsResultInfo;
+import 
org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.internals.AdminApiFuture.SimpleAdminApiFuture;
+import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.internals.AdminApiHandler.Batched;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.Node;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.TopicPartition;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.ApiException;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidMetadataException;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.RetriableException;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.UnsupportedVersionException;
+import 
org.apache.kafka.common.message.ListOffsetsRequestData.ListOffsetsPartition;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.message.ListOffsetsRequestData.ListOffsetsTopic;
+import 
org.apache.kafka.common.message.ListOffsetsResponseData.ListOffsetsPartitionResponse;
+import 
org.apache.kafka.common.message.ListOffsetsResponseData.ListOffsetsTopicResponse;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.Errors;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.requests.AbstractResponse;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.requests.ListOffsetsRequest;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.requests.ListOffsetsResponse;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.utils.CollectionUtils;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.utils.LogContext;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+
+public final class ListOffsetsHandler extends Batched<TopicPartition, 
ListOffsetsResultInfo> {
+
+    private final Map<TopicPartition, Long> offsetTimestampsByPartition;
+    private final ListOffsetsOptions options;
+    private final Logger log;
+    private final AdminApiLookupStrategy<TopicPartition> lookupStrategy;
+
+    public ListOffsetsHandler(
+        Map<TopicPartition, Long> offsetTimestampsByPartition,
+        ListOffsetsOptions options,
+        LogContext logContext
+    ) {
+        this.offsetTimestampsByPartition = offsetTimestampsByPartition;
+        this.options = options;
+        this.log = logContext.logger(ListOffsetsHandler.class);
+        this.lookupStrategy = new PartitionLeaderStrategy(logContext);
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public String apiName() {
+        return "listOffsets";
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public AdminApiLookupStrategy<TopicPartition> lookupStrategy() {
+        return this.lookupStrategy;
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    ListOffsetsRequest.Builder buildBatchedRequest(int brokerId, 
Set<TopicPartition> keys) {
+        Map<String, ListOffsetsTopic> topicsByName = 
CollectionUtils.groupPartitionsByTopic(
+            keys,
+            topicName -> new ListOffsetsTopic().setName(topicName),
+            (listOffsetsTopic, partitionId) -> {
+                TopicPartition topicPartition = new 
TopicPartition(listOffsetsTopic.name(), partitionId);
+                long offsetTimestamp = 
offsetTimestampsByPartition.get(topicPartition);
+                listOffsetsTopic.partitions().add(
+                    new ListOffsetsPartition()
+                        .setPartitionIndex(partitionId)
+                        .setTimestamp(offsetTimestamp));
+            });
+        boolean supportsMaxTimestamp = keys
+            .stream()
+            .anyMatch(key -> offsetTimestampsByPartition.get(key) == 
ListOffsetsRequest.MAX_TIMESTAMP);
+
+        return ListOffsetsRequest.Builder
+            .forConsumer(true, options.isolationLevel(), supportsMaxTimestamp)
+            .setTargetTimes(new ArrayList<>(topicsByName.values()));
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public ApiResult<TopicPartition, ListOffsetsResultInfo> handleResponse(
+        Node broker,
+        Set<TopicPartition> keys,
+        AbstractResponse abstractResponse
+    ) {
+        ListOffsetsResponse response = (ListOffsetsResponse) abstractResponse;
+        Map<TopicPartition, ListOffsetsResultInfo> completed = new HashMap<>();
+        Map<TopicPartition, Throwable> failed = new HashMap<>();
+        List<TopicPartition> unmapped = new ArrayList<>();
+        Set<TopicPartition> retriable = new HashSet<>();
+
+        for (ListOffsetsTopicResponse topic : response.topics()) {
+            for (ListOffsetsPartitionResponse partition : topic.partitions()) {
+                TopicPartition topicPartition = new 
TopicPartition(topic.name(), partition.partitionIndex());
+                Errors error = Errors.forCode(partition.errorCode());
+                if (!offsetTimestampsByPartition.containsKey(topicPartition)) {
+                    log.warn("ListOffsets response includes unknown topic 
partition {}", topicPartition);
+                } else if (error == Errors.NONE) {
+                    Optional<Integer> leaderEpoch = (partition.leaderEpoch() 
== ListOffsetsResponse.UNKNOWN_EPOCH)
+                        ? Optional.empty()
+                        : Optional.of(partition.leaderEpoch());
+                    completed.put(
+                        topicPartition,
+                        new ListOffsetsResultInfo(partition.offset(), 
partition.timestamp(), leaderEpoch));
+                } else {
+                    handlePartitionError(topicPartition, error, failed, 
unmapped, retriable);
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        // Sanity-check if the current leader for these partitions returned 
results for all of them
+        for (TopicPartition topicPartition : keys) {
+            if (unmapped.isEmpty()
+                && !completed.containsKey(topicPartition)
+                && !failed.containsKey(topicPartition)
+                && !retriable.contains(topicPartition)
+            ) {
+                ApiException sanityCheckException = new ApiException(
+                    "The response from broker " + broker.id() +
+                        " did not contain a result for topic partition " + 
topicPartition);
+                log.error(
+                    "ListOffsets request for topic partition {} failed sanity 
check",
+                    topicPartition,
+                    sanityCheckException);
+                failed.put(topicPartition, sanityCheckException);
+            }
+        }
+
+        return new ApiResult<>(completed, failed, unmapped);
+    }
+
+    private void handlePartitionError(
+        TopicPartition topicPartition,
+        Errors error,
+        Map<TopicPartition, Throwable> failed,
+        List<TopicPartition> unmapped,
+        Set<TopicPartition> retriable
+    ) {
+        ApiException apiException = error.exception();
+        if (apiException instanceof InvalidMetadataException) {
+            log.debug(
+                "ListOffsets lookup request for topic partition {} will be 
retried due to invalid metadata",
+                topicPartition,
+                apiException);
+            unmapped.add(topicPartition);

Review Comment:
   Done.
   
   > In the long run, we can maintain this information in each lookupStrategy, 
but for now, we just retry on these 2 cases similar to DescribeProducersHandler 
and DescribeTransactionsHandler.
   
   Wouldn't we have to keep that code in the handlers as well, as the metadata 
changes might have happened after the lookup stage has completed? Or do you 
mean abstracting the handling of failures that require unmapping in a common 
method of the lookup strategy?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to