[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17715193#comment-17715193
 ] 

Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-14892:
---------------------------------

Sounds good to me. Including storage in the package name probably helps avoid 
the split package issue.

> Harmonize package names in storage module
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-14892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14892
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ismael Juma
>            Priority: Major
>
> We currently have:
>  # org.apache.kafka.server.log.remote.storage: public api in storage-api 
> module
>  # org.apache.kafka.server.log.remote: private api in storage module
>  # org.apache.kafka.storage.internals.log: private api in storage module
> A way to make this consistent could be:
>  # org.apache.kafka.storage.* or org.apache.kafka.storage.api.*: public api 
> in storage-api module
>  # org.apache.kafka.storage.internals.log.remote: private api in storage 
> module
>  # org.apache.kafka.storage.internals.log: private api in storage module 
> (stays the same)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to