divijvaidya commented on code in PR #14176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14176#discussion_r1291222788


##########
storage/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/storage/internals/log/LogConfig.java:
##########
@@ -459,49 +463,53 @@ public static void validateValues(Map<?, ?> props) {
         long maxCompactionLag = (Long) 
props.get(TopicConfig.MAX_COMPACTION_LAG_MS_CONFIG);
         if (minCompactionLag > maxCompactionLag) {
             throw new InvalidConfigurationException("conflict topic config 
setting "
-                + TopicConfig.MIN_COMPACTION_LAG_MS_CONFIG + " (" + 
minCompactionLag + ") > "
-                + TopicConfig.MAX_COMPACTION_LAG_MS_CONFIG + " (" + 
maxCompactionLag + ")");
+                    + TopicConfig.MIN_COMPACTION_LAG_MS_CONFIG + " (" + 
minCompactionLag + ") > "
+                    + TopicConfig.MAX_COMPACTION_LAG_MS_CONFIG + " (" + 
maxCompactionLag + ")");
         }
+    }
 
-        if (props.containsKey(TopicConfig.REMOTE_LOG_STORAGE_ENABLE_CONFIG)) {
-            boolean isRemoteStorageEnabled = (Boolean) 
props.get(TopicConfig.REMOTE_LOG_STORAGE_ENABLE_CONFIG);
-            String cleanupPolicy = 
props.get(TopicConfig.CLEANUP_POLICY_CONFIG).toString().toLowerCase(Locale.getDefault());
-            if (isRemoteStorageEnabled && 
cleanupPolicy.contains(TopicConfig.CLEANUP_POLICY_COMPACT)) {
-                throw new ConfigException("Remote log storage is unsupported 
for the compacted topics");
-            }
+    public static void validateValuesInBroker(Map<?, ?> props) {
+        validateValues(props);
+        Boolean isRemoteLogStorageSystemEnabled =
+                (Boolean) 
props.get(RemoteLogManagerConfig.REMOTE_LOG_STORAGE_SYSTEM_ENABLE_PROP);
+        Boolean isRemoteStorageEnabled = (Boolean) 
props.get(TopicConfig.REMOTE_LOG_STORAGE_ENABLE_CONFIG);
+        if (!isRemoteLogStorageSystemEnabled && isRemoteStorageEnabled) {
+            throw new ConfigException("Tiered Storage functionality is 
disabled in the broker. " +
+                    "Topic cannot be configured with remote log storage.");
         }
 
-        if (props.containsKey(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG)) {
-            Long retentionBytes = (Long) 
props.get(TopicConfig.RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG);
-            Long localLogRetentionBytes = (Long) 
props.get(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG);
-            if (retentionBytes > -1 && localLogRetentionBytes != -2) {
-                if (localLogRetentionBytes == -1) {
-                    String message = String.format("Value must not be -1 as %s 
value is set as %d.",
-                            TopicConfig.RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, 
retentionBytes);
-                    throw new 
ConfigException(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, 
localLogRetentionBytes, message);
-                }
-                if (localLogRetentionBytes > retentionBytes) {
-                    String message = String.format("Value must not be more 
than %s property value: %d",
-                            TopicConfig.RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, 
retentionBytes);
-                    throw new 
ConfigException(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, 
localLogRetentionBytes, message);
-                }
+        String cleanupPolicy = 
props.get(TopicConfig.CLEANUP_POLICY_CONFIG).toString().toLowerCase(Locale.getDefault());
+        if (isRemoteStorageEnabled && 
cleanupPolicy.contains(TopicConfig.CLEANUP_POLICY_COMPACT)) {
+            throw new ConfigException("Remote log storage is unsupported for 
the compacted topics");
+        }
+
+        Long retentionBytes = (Long) 
props.get(TopicConfig.RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG);
+        Long localLogRetentionBytes = (Long) 
props.get(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG);
+        if (isRemoteStorageEnabled && retentionBytes > -1 && 
localLogRetentionBytes != -2) {
+            if (localLogRetentionBytes == -1) {
+                String message = String.format("Value must not be -1 as %s 
value is set as %d.",
+                        TopicConfig.RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, retentionBytes);
+                throw new 
ConfigException(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, 
localLogRetentionBytes, message);
+            }
+            if (localLogRetentionBytes > retentionBytes) {
+                String message = String.format("Value must not be more than %s 
property value: %d",
+                        TopicConfig.RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, retentionBytes);
+                throw new 
ConfigException(TopicConfig.LOCAL_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES_CONFIG, 
localLogRetentionBytes, message);
             }

Review Comment:
   I should have been more clear. LogConfig.validateValues() is called on both 
client as well as server. It actually also called when we create LogManager 
e.g. at 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/f137da04fa71734d176e19f5800622f4b4dfdb66/core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/LogManager.scala#L1379
 
   
   My point in suggesting to add this in `validateValues()` was that it is the 
method which is called by other places in the code (example above) when they 
want to do a validation on values associated with a topic. Now, we could change 
all calls in broker to `validateValues()` to use `validateValuesInBroker()` OR 
we encapsulate some of the code which depends on topic level validation (not 
the ones where assertion depends on both broker and topic config) to 
`validateValues()`.
   
   If we don't make this change, the above LogManager code will not be 
validating assertions associated with topic level configuration of 
`retentionBytes` which is a miss?!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to