riedelmax commented on code in PR #14124: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14124#discussion_r1303884738
########## clients/src/main/resources/common/message/ConsumerGroupDescribeRequest.json: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more +// contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with +// this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. +// The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 +// (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with +// the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +// limitations under the License. + +{ + "apiKey": 71, Review Comment: I was wondering about that too. It is specified as 71 here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-848%3A+The+Next+Generation+of+the+Consumer+Rebalance+Protocol#KIP848:TheNextGenerationoftheConsumerRebalanceProtocol-ConsumerGroupDescribeAPI But if we just count it up it would be 69 I think we should probably go with 69, but shall we then correct it in the KIP. Is that even allowed when the KIP is in accepted state? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
