vamossagar12 commented on code in PR #13801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13801#discussion_r1463165311
##########
connect/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/storage/ConnectorOffsetBackingStore.java:
##########
@@ -279,15 +290,54 @@ public Future<Void> set(Map<ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer>
values, Callback<Void> callb
throw new IllegalStateException("At least one non-null offset
store must be provided");
}
- return primaryStore.set(values, (primaryWriteError, ignored) -> {
+ List<ByteBuffer> partitionsWithTombstoneOffsets =
values.entrySet().stream()
+ .filter(offsetEntry -> offsetEntry.getValue() == null)
+ .map(Map.Entry::getKey).collect(Collectors.toList());
+
+ Map<ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer> tombstoneOffsets = new HashMap<>();
+ for (ByteBuffer partition : partitionsWithTombstoneOffsets) {
+ tombstoneOffsets.put(partition, null);
+ }
+ Map<ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer> regularOffsets = values.entrySet().stream()
+ .filter(offsetEntry -> offsetEntry.getValue() != null)
+ .collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey,
Map.Entry::getValue));
+
+ // If the supplied offsets contain tombstone values, then tombstone
offsets are extracted first,
+ // written to the secondary store in a synchronous manner and then to
the primary store.
+ // This is because, if a tombstone offset is successfully written to
the per-connector offsets topic,
+ // but cannot be written to the global offsets topic, then the global
offsets topic will still contain that
+ // source offset, but the per-connector topic will not. Due to the
fallback-on-global logic used by the worker,
+ // if a task requests offsets for one of the tombstoned partitions,
the worker will provide it with the
+ // offsets present in the global offsets topic, instead of indicating
to the task that no offsets can be found.
+ CompletableFuture<Void> offsetWriteFuture =
CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
+ if (secondaryStore != null && !tombstoneOffsets.isEmpty()) {
+ offsetWriteFuture.thenAccept(v -> {
Review Comment:
I re-read the comments again and looks like with this we are going against
the approach you wanted in this
[comment](https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13801/#discussion_r1268520271)
i.e
> That said, I don't love how we've made this method synchronously await the
write to the secondary store. We should return a Future to the caller that
corresponds to all of the offset flushes that we'd need to block on for an
offset commit (i.e., the existing flush that we're performing, possibly
preceded by a preemptive flush of tombstones to the secondary store).
Let me take a look at this again. Sorry about this but I had forgotten about
this comment in particular.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
