[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
PoAn Yang reassigned KAFKA-15949:
---------------------------------
Assignee: PoAn Yang
> Improve the KRaft metadata version related messages
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-15949
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15949
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.6.0
> Reporter: Jakub Scholz
> Assignee: PoAn Yang
> Priority: Major
>
> Various error messages related to KRaft seem to use very different style and
> formatting. Just for example in the {{StorageTool}} Scala class, there are
> two different examples:
> * {{Must specify a valid KRaft metadata version of at least 3.0.}}
> ** Refers to "metadata version"
> ** Refers to the version as 3.0 (although strictly speaking 3.0-IV0 is not
> valid for KRaft)
> * {{SCRAM is only supported in metadataVersion IBP_3_5_IV2 or later.}}
> ** Talks about "metadataVersion"
> ** Refers to "IBP_3_5_IV2" instead of "3.5" or "3.5-IV2"
> Other pieces of Kafka code seem to also talk about "metadata.version" for
> example.
> For users, it would be nice if the style and formats used were the same
> everywhere. Would it be worth unifying messages like this? If yes, what would
> be the preferred style to use?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
