[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Luke Chen resolved KAFKA-15949. ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.8.0 Resolution: Fixed > Improve the KRaft metadata version related messages > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-15949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15949 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.6.0 > Reporter: Jakub Scholz > Assignee: PoAn Yang > Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.8.0 > > > Various error messages related to KRaft seem to use very different style and > formatting. Just for example in the {{StorageTool}} Scala class, there are > two different examples: > * {{Must specify a valid KRaft metadata version of at least 3.0.}} > ** Refers to "metadata version" > ** Refers to the version as 3.0 (although strictly speaking 3.0-IV0 is not > valid for KRaft) > * {{SCRAM is only supported in metadataVersion IBP_3_5_IV2 or later.}} > ** Talks about "metadataVersion" > ** Refers to "IBP_3_5_IV2" instead of "3.5" or "3.5-IV2" > Other pieces of Kafka code seem to also talk about "metadata.version" for > example. > For users, it would be nice if the style and formats used were the same > everywhere. Would it be worth unifying messages like this? If yes, what would > be the preferred style to use? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)