brandboat commented on code in PR #16231: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16231#discussion_r1634619526
########## jmh-benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/jmh/util/ConcurrentMapBenchmark.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.kafka.jmh.util; + +import org.apache.kafka.common.utils.CopyOnWriteMap; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Benchmark; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.BenchmarkMode; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Fork; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Measurement; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Mode; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.OperationsPerInvocation; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.OutputTimeUnit; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Param; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Scope; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Setup; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.State; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Threads; +import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Warmup; +import org.openjdk.jmh.infra.Blackhole; + +import java.util.Map; +import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap; +import java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom; +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; +import java.util.stream.Collectors; +import java.util.stream.IntStream; + +@State(Scope.Benchmark) +@Fork(value = 1) +@Warmup(iterations = 5) +@Measurement(iterations = 15) +@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime) +@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS) +@Threads(2) +public class ConcurrentMapBenchmark { + private static final int TIMES = 1000_000; + + @Param({"100"}) + private int mapSize; + + @Param({"0.1"}) + private double writePercentage; + + private Map<Integer, Integer> concurrentHashMap; + private Map<Integer, Integer> copyOnWriteMap; + private int writePerLoops; + + @Setup + public void setup() { + Map<Integer, Integer> mapTemplate = IntStream.range(0, mapSize).boxed() + .collect(Collectors.toMap(i -> i, i -> i)); + concurrentHashMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(mapTemplate); + copyOnWriteMap = new CopyOnWriteMap<>(mapTemplate); + writePerLoops = TIMES / (int) Math.round(writePercentage * TIMES); + } + + @Benchmark + @OperationsPerInvocation(TIMES) + public void testConcurrentHashMapGet(Blackhole blackhole) { + for (int i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) { + if (i % writePerLoops == 0) { + // add offset mapSize to ensure computeIfAbsent do add new entry + concurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent(i + mapSize, key -> key); + } else { + blackhole.consume(concurrentHashMap.get(i % mapSize)); + } + } + } + + @Benchmark + @OperationsPerInvocation(TIMES) + public void testConcurrentHashMapGetRandom(Blackhole blackhole) { + for (int i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) { + if (i % writePerLoops == 0) { + // add offset mapSize to ensure computeIfAbsent do add new entry + concurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent(i + mapSize, key -> key); + } else { + blackhole.consume(concurrentHashMap.get(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(0, mapSize + 1))); + } + } + } + + @Benchmark + @OperationsPerInvocation(TIMES) + public void testCopyOnWriteMapGet(Blackhole blackhole) { + for (int i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) { + if (i % writePerLoops == 0) { + // add offset mapSize to ensure computeIfAbsent do add new entry + copyOnWriteMap.computeIfAbsent(i + mapSize, key -> key); + } else { + blackhole.consume(copyOnWriteMap.get(i % mapSize)); + } + } + } + + @Benchmark + @OperationsPerInvocation(TIMES) + public void testCopyOnWriteMapGetRandom(Blackhole blackhole) { + for (int i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) { + if (i % writePerLoops == 0) { + // add offset mapSize to ensure computeIfAbsent do add new entry + copyOnWriteMap.computeIfAbsent(i + mapSize, key -> key); + } else { + blackhole.consume(copyOnWriteMap.get(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(0, mapSize + 1))); + } + } + } + + @Benchmark + @OperationsPerInvocation(TIMES) + public void testConcurrentHashMapValues(Blackhole blackhole) { + for (int i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) { + if (i % writePerLoops == 0) { + // add offset mapSize to ensure computeIfAbsent do add new entry + concurrentHashMap.computeIfAbsent(i + mapSize, key -> key); + } else { + blackhole.consume(concurrentHashMap.values()); Review Comment: It is a bug, setup level should be Invocation instead of the default value (Trial), otherwise computeIfAbsent won't work in the iterations other than the first iteration. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
