C0urante commented on PR #16496: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16496#issuecomment-2231678731
Ah, that makes sense. Can you update the description to cover that scenario, and any others where this improvement seems warranted? It also looks like we emit an incorrect error message in at least some cases when the topic exists but the targeted partition does not. I ran into this catch clause when I tested locally, which incorrectly states that the topic wasn't present even though it was: https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/6cffed56f6a140d37bc0f210d4e786f78dc1631a/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/KafkaProducer.java#L1181-L1182 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
