dongnuo123 commented on code in PR #16845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16845#discussion_r1711605858
##########
tests/kafkatest/tests/client/consumer_test.py:
##########
@@ -123,9 +123,10 @@ def test_broker_rolling_bounce(self,
metadata_quorum=quorum.zk, use_new_coordina
# nodes have time to expire
self.rolling_bounce_brokers(consumer, clean_shutdown=True)
- unexpected_rebalances = consumer.num_rebalances() - num_rebalances
- assert unexpected_rebalances == 0, \
- "Broker rolling bounce caused %d unexpected group rebalances" %
unexpected_rebalances
+ if group_protocol == consumer_group.classic_group_protocol:
+ unexpected_rebalances = consumer.num_rebalances() - num_rebalances
+ assert unexpected_rebalances == 0, \
+ "Broker rolling bounce caused %d unexpected group rebalances"
% unexpected_rebalances
Review Comment:
The [current
framework](https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0a4a12fbc4df0ac4b141a869d3880b15b66a7759/tests/kafkatest/services/verifiable_consumer.py#L454-L456)
calculates `num_rebalances` by increment by one every time a new assignment is
received.
For new protocol consumer, if reconciliation happens during bouncing the
brokers, `num_rebalances` will also be incremented. Currently there's no way to
figure out whether a new rebalance is triggered or a reconciliation happens, so
the assertion is skipped here.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
