[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17887640#comment-17887640
 ] 

Benoit Delbosc edited comment on KAFKA-15402 at 10/8/24 3:50 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, 
Any plan to have a consumer option to skip the {{maybeCloseFetchSessions}}  
which, as I understand, is an optimization for memory footprint? 
This is significantly impacting our unit tests duration, starting/stopping ~50 
consumers takes 10 seconds per test. 
This forces us to stay with the old 3.4.1.
Regards.
ben.


was (Author: bdelbosc):
Hi, 
Any plan to have a consumer option to skip the {{maybeCloseFetchSessions}} that 
is from my understanding just an optimization for memory footprint ? 
Again this is impacting deeply our unit tests duration, starting/stopping ~50 
consumers takes 10s per test, so we are forced to stay on old 3.4.1.
Regards.
ben.

> Performance regression on close consumer after upgrading to 3.5.0
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-15402
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15402
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: clients, consumer
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0, 3.6.0, 3.5.1
>            Reporter: Benoit Delbosc
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: consumer-threading-refactor
>             Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>         Attachments: image-2023-08-24-18-51-21-720.png, 
> image-2023-08-24-18-51-57-435.png, image-2023-08-25-10-50-28-079.png
>
>
> Hi,
> After upgrading to Kafka client version 3.5.0, we have observed a significant 
> increase in the duration of our Java unit tests. These unit tests heavily 
> rely on the Kafka Admin, Producer, and Consumer API.
> When using Kafka server version 3.4.1, the duration of the unit tests 
> increased from 8 seconds (with Kafka client 3.4.1) to 18 seconds (with Kafka 
> client 3.5.0).
> Upgrading the Kafka server to 3.5.1 show similar results.
> I have come across the issue KAFKA-15178, which could be the culprit. I will 
> attempt to test the proposed patch.
> In the meantime, if you have any ideas that could help identify and address 
> the regression, please let me know.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to