[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16662460#comment-16662460
 ] 

Ewen Cheslack-Postava commented on KAFKA-7481:
----------------------------------------------

[~lindong] we might just want to update the script with a flag to override any 
remaining blockers (and maybe even just list them in the notes for the RC). 
Ideally we don't hit this type of situation regularly, but when we do, might be 
better to be able to override on the release mgr side rather than possibly 
losing stuff by adjusting priorities on the JIRA.

> Consider options for safer upgrade of offset commit value schema
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-7481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7481
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> KIP-211 and KIP-320 add new versions of the offset commit value schema. The 
> use of the new schema version is controlled by the 
> `inter.broker.protocol.version` configuration.  Once the new inter-broker 
> version is in use, it is not possible to downgrade since the older brokers 
> will not be able to parse the new schema. 
> The options at the moment are the following:
> 1. Do nothing. Users can try the new version and keep 
> `inter.broker.protocol.version` locked to the old release. Downgrade will 
> still be possible, but users will not be able to test new capabilities which 
> depend on inter-broker protocol changes.
> 2. Instead of using `inter.broker.protocol.version`, we could use 
> `message.format.version`. This would basically extend the use of this config 
> to apply to all persistent formats. The advantage is that it allows users to 
> upgrade the broker and begin using the new inter-broker protocol while still 
> allowing downgrade. But features which depend on the persistent format could 
> not be tested.
> Any other options?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to