[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16708953#comment-16708953
]
John Roesler commented on KAFKA-7660:
-------------------------------------
Sounds good! We'll go ahead and leave this ticket "resolved", then, and
possibly open a new one in response to a future analysis.
I've got PRs open to all the branches, so (once they're merged), they'll be
included in the next AK release of whichever branch, and also in the
corresponding CP release.
Having them request a CP release would possibly speed up this process.
> Stream Metrics - Memory Analysis
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-7660
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7660
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: metrics, streams
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Patrik Kleindl
> Assignee: John Roesler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
> Attachments: Mem_Collections.jpeg, Mem_DuplicateStrings.jpeg,
> Mem_DuplicateStrings2.jpeg, Mem_Hotspots.jpeg, Mem_KeepAliveSet.jpeg,
> Mem_References.jpeg, heapdump-1543441898901.hprof
>
>
> During the analysis of JVM memory two possible issues were shown which I
> would like to bring to your attention:
> 1) Duplicate strings
> Top findings:
> string_content="stream-processor-node-metrics" count="534,277"
> string_content="processor-node-id" count="148,437"
> string_content="stream-rocksdb-state-metrics" count="41,832"
> string_content="punctuate-latency-avg" count="29,681"
>
> "stream-processor-node-metrics" seems to be used in Sensors.java as a
> literal and not interned.
>
> 2) The HashMap parentSensors from
> org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals.StreamThread$StreamsMetricsThreadImpl
> was reported multiple times as suspicious for potentially keeping alive a
> lot of objects. In our case the reported size was 40-50MB each.
> I haven't looked too deep in the code but noticed that the class Sensor.java
> which is used as a key in the HashMap does not implement equals or hashCode
> method. Not sure this is a problem though.
>
> The analysis was done with Dynatrace 7.0
> We are running Confluent 5.0/Kafka2.0-cp1 (Brokers as well as Clients)
>
> Screenshots are attached.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
