lianetm commented on code in PR #18989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18989#discussion_r1969791054
##########
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala:
##########
@@ -2592,6 +2606,32 @@ class KafkaApis(val requestChannel: RequestChannel,
response.groups.addAll(results)
}
+ // Clients are not allowed to see topics that are not authorized for
Describe.
+ val topicsToCheck = new mutable.HashSet[String]
+ response.groups.forEach(_.members.forEach { member =>
+ List(member.assignment, member.targetAssignment).foreach {
assignment =>
+ assignment.topicPartitions.asScala.foreach { tp =>
+ topicsToCheck += tp.topicName
+ }
+ }
+ })
+ val authorizedTopics =
authHelper.filterByAuthorized(request.context, DESCRIBE, TOPIC,
+ topicsToCheck)(identity)
+ val updatedGroups = response.groups.asScala.map { group =>
+ if (group.members.asScala.exists(member =>
+ List(member.assignment,
member.targetAssignment).exists(assignment =>
+ assignment.topicPartitions.asScala.exists(tp =>
!authorizedTopics.contains(tp.topicName))))) {
+ new ConsumerGroupDescribeResponseData.DescribedGroup()
+ .setGroupId(group.groupId)
+ .setErrorCode(Errors.TOPIC_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED.code)
+ .setErrorMessage("The group has described topic(s) that the
client is not authorized to describe.")
Review Comment:
this one I find it valuable, not the same case as my other comment. In this
case we don't have topics in the request, so getting a topic_auth in response
may not be clear enough, and this generic msg may be helpful.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
