jolshan commented on code in PR #19910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19910#discussion_r2133075311


##########
core/src/main/scala/kafka/coordinator/transaction/TransactionCoordinator.scala:
##########
@@ -819,11 +819,14 @@ class TransactionCoordinator(txnConfig: TransactionConfig,
                 }
 
               if (nextState == TransactionState.PREPARE_ABORT && isEpochFence) 
{
-                // We should clear the pending state to make way for the 
transition to PrepareAbort and also bump
-                // the epoch in the transaction metadata we are about to 
append.
+                // We should clear the pending state to make way for the 
transition to PrepareAbort
                 txnMetadata.pendingState = None
-                txnMetadata.producerEpoch = producerEpoch
-                txnMetadata.lastProducerEpoch = RecordBatch.NO_PRODUCER_EPOCH
+                if (!clientTransactionVersion.supportsEpochBump()) {

Review Comment:
   Wouldn't this path be covered by 
   ```    if (!clientTransactionVersion.supportsEpochBump()) {
         endTransactionWithTV1(transactionalId, producerId, producerEpoch, 
txnMarkerResult, isFromClient, responseCallback, requestLocal)
         return
       }
   ```
   earlier in the method?    



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to