kirktrue commented on code in PR #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17022#discussion_r2143261652
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/internals/TransactionManager.java:
##########
@@ -779,14 +779,25 @@ public synchronized void
maybeTransitionToErrorState(RuntimeException exception)
}
synchronized void handleFailedBatch(ProducerBatch batch, RuntimeException
exception, boolean adjustSequenceNumbers) {
- maybeTransitionToErrorState(exception);
+ // Compare the batch with the current ProducerIdAndEpoch. If the
producer IDs are the *same* but the epochs
+ // are *different*, consider the batch as stale.
+ boolean isStaleBatch = batch.producerId() ==
producerIdAndEpoch.producerId && batch.producerEpoch() !=
producerIdAndEpoch.epoch;
Review Comment:
So it sounds like `batch.producerEpoch() < producerIdAndEpoch.epoch` is
really more appropriate as a "staleness" check and let the
`TransactionManager` handle the other cases?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
