mjsax commented on code in PR #20767:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20767#discussion_r2496586923


##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/DefaultStateUpdater.java:
##########
@@ -349,23 +345,26 @@ private void handleTaskCorruptedException(final 
TaskCorruptedException taskCorru
         // TODO: we can let the exception encode the actual corrupted 
changelog partitions and only
         //       mark those instead of marking all changelogs
         private void removeCheckpointForCorruptedTask(final Task task) {
-            task.markChangelogAsCorrupted(task.changelogPartitions());
+            try {
+                task.markChangelogAsCorrupted(task.changelogPartitions());
 
-            // we need to enforce a checkpoint that removes the corrupted 
partitions
-            measureCheckpointLatency(() -> task.maybeCheckpoint(true));
+                // we need to enforce a checkpoint that removes the corrupted 
partitions
+                measureCheckpointLatency(() -> task.maybeCheckpoint(true));
+            } catch (final StreamsException e) {
+                log.warn("Checkpoint failed for corrupted task {}", task.id(), 
e);
+            }
         }
 
         private void handleStreamsException(final StreamsException 
streamsException) {
             log.info("Encountered streams exception: ", streamsException);
             if (streamsException.taskId().isPresent()) {
-                handleStreamsExceptionWithTask(streamsException);
+                handleStreamsExceptionWithTask(streamsException, 
streamsException.taskId().get());
             } else {
                 handleStreamsExceptionWithoutTask(streamsException);
             }
         }
 
-        private void handleStreamsExceptionWithTask(final StreamsException 
streamsException) {
-            final TaskId failedTaskId = streamsException.taskId().get();
+        private void handleStreamsExceptionWithTask(final StreamsException 
streamsException, final TaskId failedTaskId) {

Review Comment:
   Why do we need this change? Seem the overall idea is to add `TaskId` to 
`StreamsException` if we have a `TaskId` at hand when we create the 
`StreamsException`. Why do we need a second way to get the `TaskId` ?
   
   Or to rephrase: why can't we update the code which throws a 
`StreamsException` to include the `TaskId` ?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to