[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18039235#comment-18039235
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-19751:
----------------------------------------
srdo commented on PR #748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/748#issuecomment-3549504916
> If we wish to remove 23 from the documentation, we should replace it with
24 or 25
The problem is that 3.9 CI runs Java 23. If 3.9 wants to list support for
25, we'd need to backport the Java upgrade (and various changes) to 3.9.
IIRC there were no production code changes needed to support 25, just
various upgrades for plugins like Spotbugs, so I guess whether backporting
those changes is worth it depends on whether there is demand for it?
It feels iffy to me to claim support for a Java version for 3.9 that 3.9's
CI doesn't run against, so I think 3.9 can at most claim to be compatible with
23, and 22-24 are EOL and no one should be using them anymore.
> Also if the 3.9 documentation says 23 but the trunk documentation says 21,
it appears that our version support has regressed, when I don't think it really
has.
Completely agree, but I think the fix should be for the trunk documentation
to claim support for Java 25, since that's what CI runs now, as far as I know.
I think maybe listing that version was just missed?
> Fix the "6.6 Java Version" for branch 3.9
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-19751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19751
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: PoAn Yang
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.9.2
>
>
> see https://lists.apache.org/thread/xv04txcy4wwtpkn1zfqxqf95098ls61h
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
