CalvinConfluent commented on code in PR #14594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14594#discussion_r2620028116
##########
core/src/main/scala/kafka/cluster/Partition.scala:
##########
@@ -359,10 +361,14 @@ class Partition(val topicPartition: TopicPartition,
// a false positive under min isr check, it has to check the
leaderReplicaIdOpt again. Though it can still be affected
// by ABA problems when leader->follower->leader, but it should be good
enough for a metric.
def isUnderMinIsr: Boolean = {
- leaderLogIfLocal.exists { partitionState.isr.size <
_.config.minInSyncReplicas } && isLeader
+ leaderLogIfLocal.exists{partitionState.isr.size < effectiveMinIsr(_) } &&
isLeader
}
- def isAtMinIsr: Boolean = leaderLogIfLocal.exists { partitionState.isr.size
== _.config.minInSyncReplicas }
+ private def effectiveMinIsr(leaderLog: UnifiedLog): Int = {
+ leaderLog.config.minInSyncReplicas.min(remoteReplicasMap.size + 1)
Review Comment:
> When modifying min.insync.replicas or adjusting the replica count, we
could check whether the change is valid.
It would be a useful change for the user experience. But it is not included
in the KIP. The KIP utilize an workaround as @artemlivshits quoted above.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
