kamalcph commented on code in PR #20913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20913#discussion_r3278939155


##########
storage/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/server/log/remote/storage/RemoteLogManager.java:
##########
@@ -937,6 +946,68 @@ List<EnrichedLogSegment> candidateLogSegments(UnifiedLog 
log, Long fromOffset, L
             return candidateLogSegments;
         }
 
+        private boolean delayCopy(LogConfig logConfig, LogSegment previousSeg, 
long currentTimeMs, long totalLogSize, long cumulativeSize) {
+            if (logConfig == null) {
+                return false;
+            }
+
+            long copyLagMs = logConfig.remoteCopyLagMs();
+            long copyLagBytes = logConfig.remoteCopyLagBytes();
+            if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
+                logger.trace("delayCopy check for segment {}: copyLagMs={}, 
copyLagBytes={}, currentTimeMs={}, totalLogSize={}, cumulativeSize={}, 
sizeLagBytes={}",
+                        previousSeg, copyLagMs, copyLagBytes, currentTimeMs, 
totalLogSize, cumulativeSize, totalLogSize - cumulativeSize);
+            }
+
+            if (copyLagMs == 0 || copyLagBytes == 0) {
+                return false;
+            }
+
+            boolean needCheckCopyLagMs =  copyLagMs > 0;
+            boolean needCheckCopyLagBytes = copyLagBytes > 0;
+
+            // When no lag delay is enabled, upload immediately.
+            if (!needCheckCopyLagMs && !needCheckCopyLagBytes) {

Review Comment:
   > I keep using -1 as the effective value when local retention is unlimited 
and lag is -1.
   
   This approach is also fine. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to