[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Lucy Liu reassigned KAFKA-20823:
--------------------------------

    Assignee: Lucy Liu  (was: Matthias J. Sax)

> Relax null-value restriction in Kafka Streams joins
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-20823
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20823
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
>            Assignee: Lucy Liu
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: needs-kip
>
> Historically, Kafka Streams DSL treats `null` keys or values as malformed 
> data in certain cases, and this is still the right thing to do for many 
> operators.
> With KIP-962 
> ([https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/KAFKA/pages/263426175/KIP-962+Relax+non-null+key+requirement+in+Kafka+Streams])
>  we lifted some constraints for case in which it does make sense for 
> null-keys.
> I believe, we could lift even more restrictions for null-values in KStreams 
> and leftJoins (at least left-stream-table joins – not sure about left/outer 
> stream-stream join – we want to avoid ambiguity of `null` with could also 
> mean "record does not exist" what is semantically different to "record exists 
> but has null-value").
> If the left (ie, KStream record) value is null, we could still produce a 
> left-join result (it's an open question if we would call the KeyValueMapper 
> for stream-globalTable case or not for this case – note, that for 
> stream-globalTable join, we already allow KeyValueMapper to also return null, 
> and produce a leftJoin result for this case – this is the exact same line of 
> thinking).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to