[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16838565#comment-16838565
 ] 

Andrew edited comment on KAFKA-8315 at 5/13/19 3:52 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------

This is the test enhanced to use timestamp extraction, and it works  ;

[https://github.com/the4thamigo-uk/kafka/commit/5121851491f2fd0471d8f3c49940175e23a26f1b]

 

So, it would seem that the issue is how the data is read when the data is 
already fully populated in the source topics. Seems like, as we discussed 
previously, it simply reads all the left records first, then the right records. 
How can we throttle the ingestion of the records to avoid this?


was (Author: the4thamigo_uk):
This is the test enhanced to use timestamp extraction, and it works  ;

[https://github.com/the4thamigo-uk/kafka/commit/5121851491f2fd0471d8f3c49940175e23a26f1b]

 

So, it would seem that the issue is how the data is read when the data is 
already fully populated in the source topics.

> Cannot pass Materialized into a join operation - hence cant set retention 
> period independent of grace
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-8315
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8315
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Andrew
>            Assignee: John Roesler
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: code.java
>
>
> The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()` 
> ([https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-]),
>  but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join 
> operation, only to the group operation is supported it seems.
>  
> Slack conversation here : 
> [https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300]
> [Additional]
> From what I understand, the retention period should be independent of the 
> grace period, so I think this is more than a documentation fix (see comments 
> below)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to