muralibasani commented on code in PR #22873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/22873#discussion_r4097636082
##########
storage/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/storage/internals/log/UnifiedLog.java:
##########
@@ -2000,39 +2000,34 @@ public interface DeletionCondition {
}
private int deleteRetentionMsBreachedSegments() throws IOException {
- long retentionMs = UnifiedLog.localRetentionMs(config(),
remoteLogEnabledAndRemoteCopyEnabled());
+ boolean remoteLogEnabledAndRemoteCopyEnabled =
remoteLogEnabledAndRemoteCopyEnabled();
+ long retentionMs = UnifiedLog.localRetentionMs(config(),
remoteLogEnabledAndRemoteCopyEnabled);
if (retentionMs < 0) return 0;
long startMs = time().milliseconds();
DeletionCondition shouldDelete = (segment, nextSegmentOpt) -> {
- if (startMs < segment.largestTimestamp()) {
- futureTimestampLogger.warn("{} contains future timestamp(s),
making it ineligible to be deleted", segment);
+ long anchorTimestamp = segment.largestTimestamp();
+ if (startMs < anchorTimestamp) {
+ if (remoteLogEnabledAndRemoteCopyEnabled) {
+ anchorTimestamp = segment.lastModified();
Review Comment:
Agree @junrao
I can remove this lastModified check, and rather add a warning (with check
based on log.message.timestamp.after.max.ms) in LogConfig when topic is being
created/altered in tiered topics flow. Also in UnifiedLog, while config is
being updated, we can add similar check.
Pls let me know if this sounds ok.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
