dajac commented on a change in pull request #8933:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8933#discussion_r456415576



##########
File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/metrics/Sensor.java
##########
@@ -97,7 +97,25 @@ public static RecordingLevel forName(String name) {
         public boolean shouldRecord(final int configId) {
             return configId == DEBUG.id || configId == this.id;
         }
+    }
 
+    public enum QuotaEnforcementType {

Review comment:
       On one side, we have names that describe how the quota enforcement 
behave, and on the other side, we have names that describe where the quota is 
enforced. I personally lean towards the current proposal but I an open to 
discuss this. My reasoning is that the current proposal is aligned with the 
naming in the quota manager as well. That makes the overall more consistent IMO.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to