C0urante commented on a change in pull request #10315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10315#discussion_r597034374



##########
File path: 
connect/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/runtime/Worker.java
##########
@@ -698,6 +700,8 @@ private WorkerTask buildWorkerTask(ClusterConfigState 
configState,
         consumerProps.put(ConsumerConfig.AUTO_OFFSET_RESET_CONFIG, "earliest");
         consumerProps.put(ConsumerConfig.KEY_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, 
"org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.ByteArrayDeserializer");
         consumerProps.put(ConsumerConfig.VALUE_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, 
"org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.ByteArrayDeserializer");
+        consumerProps.put(ConsumerConfig.PARTITION_ASSIGNMENT_STRATEGY_CONFIG,
+            CooperativeStickyAssignor.class.getName() + "," + 
RangeAssignor.class.getName());

Review comment:
       Yeah, a comment is definitely warranted, good call.
   
   We might use the `RoundRobinAssignor` but don't think we have to settle for 
that just yet. There's a couple of bugs/improvements in the way, but at least 
one of them is being actively worked on 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10345) and I'm happy to take care of the 
other.
   
   I converted this to a draft since it's definitely not ready for merge yet 
and it's unclear which path forward we might want to take. We might want to 
reason through this carefully since we only get one shot to do this kind of 
automated upgrade before the next one gets more complicated (the list of 
assignors will grow from one to two this time around; it'll either have to grow 
from two to three the next, or we'll have to risk breaking changes for users 
who skip an upgrade step).
   
   I'll try to do an analysis of the pros/cons of the 
`CooperativeStickyAssignor` vs the `RoundRobinAssignor` with regards to sink 
connectors on the Jira ticket; I'm actually leaning a tiny bit toward the 
`RoundRobinAssignor` but I might be suffering from tunnel vision due to recent 
misadventures with other assignors.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to