[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17352903#comment-17352903 ]
Pedro Gontijo commented on KAFKA-12845: --------------------------------------- Got it. But if you look at the code before the change you will see that its behavior was exactly what you have suggested in (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12317). It was already there. KStream->KTable *and* KStream->GlobalKTable were both ok with null join-keys on left join scenarios. The change proposed by KAFKA-10277 is totally ok, but actually, the code change was beyond the proposed when instead of just removing "key == null" from condition "if (*key* == null || value == null)" at line 69, it made it "if (*mappedKey* == null || value == null)". So, yes, this can be closed, but I would definitely advocate for K12317 to be a bug fix because what we have now in 2.7.x is not only changing behavior (in a negative way I think) but also affecting performance by querying the state store unnecessarily. > Rollback change which requires join key to be non null on > KStream->GlobalKTable > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-12845 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12845 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: streams > Affects Versions: 2.7.0 > Reporter: Pedro Gontijo > Priority: Major > > As part of [KAFKA-10277|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10277] > the behavior for KStream->GlobalKtable joins was changed to require non null > join keys. > But it seems reasonable that not every record will have an existing > relationship (and hence a key) with the join globalktable. Think about a > User>Car for instance, or PageView>Product. An empty/zero key could be > returned by the KeyMapper but that will make a totally unnecessary search > into the store. > I do not think that makes sense for any GlobalKtable join (inner or left) but > for left join it sounds even more strange. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)