dengziming commented on a change in pull request #10852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10852#discussion_r649629620



##########
File path: 
log4j-appender/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/log4jappender/KafkaLog4jAppenderTest.java
##########
@@ -158,18 +160,18 @@ public void 
testRealProducerConfigWithSyncSendAndNotIgnoringExceptionsShouldThro
         assertThrows(RuntimeException.class, () -> 
logger.error(getMessage(0)));
     }
 
+    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

Review comment:
       Because Mockito.mock() returns `MockProducer` but we need 
`MockProducer<byte[], byte[]>`, this is similar to 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/5936a249bda171851cfa669da4276d23230eab6e/raft/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/raft/internals/MemoryBatchReaderTest.java#L46
 

##########
File path: 
log4j-appender/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/log4jappender/KafkaLog4jAppenderTest.java
##########
@@ -158,18 +160,18 @@ public void 
testRealProducerConfigWithSyncSendAndNotIgnoringExceptionsShouldThro
         assertThrows(RuntimeException.class, () -> 
logger.error(getMessage(0)));
     }
 
+    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

Review comment:
       Because Mockito.mock() returns `MockProducer` but we need 
`MockProducer<byte[], byte[]>`, this is similar to 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/5936a249bda171851cfa669da4276d23230eab6e/raft/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/raft/internals/MemoryBatchReaderTest.java#L45

##########
File path: 
log4j-appender/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/log4jappender/KafkaLog4jAppenderTest.java
##########
@@ -158,18 +160,18 @@ public void 
testRealProducerConfigWithSyncSendAndNotIgnoringExceptionsShouldThro
         assertThrows(RuntimeException.class, () -> 
logger.error(getMessage(0)));
     }
 
+    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

Review comment:
       We have 2 variables here that need to be suppressed, `futureMock` and 
`producer`, so it seems better to suppress them at the method level, WDYT?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to