kowshik commented on a change in pull request #11345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11345#discussion_r719733337
##########
File path: core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/LogSegment.scala
##########
@@ -77,8 +77,9 @@ class LogSegment private[log] (val log: FileRecords,
timeIndex.resize(size)
}
- def sanityCheck(timeIndexFileNewlyCreated: Boolean): Unit = {
- if (lazyOffsetIndex.file.exists) {
+ def sanityCheck(timeIndexFileNewlyCreated: Boolean, isActiveSegment:
Boolean): Unit = {
+ // We allow for absence of offset index file only for an empty active
segment.
+ if ((isActiveSegment && size == 0) || lazyOffsetIndex.file.exists) {
Review comment:
@junrao It's a really good question.
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8346 is the PR where lazy indexes were
introduced. The description says it eliminates unnecessary disk accesses and
memory map operations while
deleting, renaming or closing offset and time indexes. As a result, a
significant shutdown time improvement was noticed. Supposing if we flushed the
empty active segment, could the shutdown time regress?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
