prat0318 commented on a change in pull request #11552:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11552#discussion_r759880730
##########
File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/Metadata.java
##########
@@ -394,7 +394,8 @@ else if (metadata.error() ==
Errors.TOPIC_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED)
if (hasReliableLeaderEpoch &&
partitionMetadata.leaderEpoch.isPresent()) {
int newEpoch = partitionMetadata.leaderEpoch.get();
Integer currentEpoch = lastSeenLeaderEpochs.get(tp);
- if (topicId != null && oldTopicId != null &&
!topicId.equals(oldTopicId)) {
+ // oldTopicId can be null (when metadata is fetched during topic
recreation), update the metadata in that case as well.
Review comment:
Ack. Changed the comment as per the suggestion.
> would it make sense to move this into the corresponding branch that it
applies to?
Sorry, couldn't get it. Can you elaborate on this please. (Do you mean a
separate `if` branch? The current `If` branch deals with separate topicId, so
that should be the one we should modify as part of this patch.)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
