showuon commented on code in PR #12096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12096#discussion_r859762128


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/producer/internals/TransactionManager.java:
##########
@@ -175,11 +175,8 @@ private static class TopicPartitionEntry {
         // responses which are due to the retention period elapsing, and those 
which are due to actual lost data.
         private long lastAckedOffset;
 
-        private static final Comparator<ProducerBatch> 
PRODUCER_BATCH_COMPARATOR = (b1, b2) -> {
-            if (b1.baseSequence() < b2.baseSequence()) return -1;
-            else if (b1.baseSequence() > b2.baseSequence()) return 1;
-            else return Integer.compare(b1.hashCode(), b2.hashCode());
-        };
+        private static final Comparator<ProducerBatch> 
PRODUCER_BATCH_COMPARATOR =
+            
Comparator.comparingInt(ProducerBatch::producerEpoch).thenComparingInt(ProducerBatch::baseSequence);

Review Comment:
   Just wondering if we should compare the `baseSequence` first because most of 
the time, it's comparing the baseSequence under the same producerEpoch.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to