Hi there, Le lundi 27 juin 2016 03:22:51 UTC+2, Neil Jenkins a écrit : > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, at 08:44 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > I'm generally adverse to sending calculated values like this through the > API. > > > Yes, I agree. This doesn't fit with the JMAP model, which as far as > possible tries to avoid sending calculated values due to the difficulty in > keeping them in sync. > >
Ok, so at the same time we proposed to compute a generated plain text field for email content. I mean, it looks like the rational here is more : we think it's cheap to code it in every clients. But what if the criteria for computing vacation activation becomes more complex with time ? I would make instantly all client wrong about their computation, doesn't it ? -- Matthieu Baechler -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JMAP" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jmap-discuss/33505393-192e-4627-94ee-6acd121bdf5a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
