DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8801>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8801 Prompt to save Test Plan on exit Summary: Prompt to save Test Plan on exit Product: JMeter Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Main AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When exiting, the following message is printed: Note to self, we should really prompt to save here... (bb) I will post a suggested patch shortly. The tricky part is deciding which object should be aware of the 'dirtiness' of the test plan (I am leaning towards the TreeModel [as in GuiPackage.getInstance().getTreeModel()] although there are probably better candidates). 'Save' should clear the 'dirtiness' of the test plan, although 'Save' may have only saved a portion of the test plan (is this by design? Saving can be done at the node level; I have been caught by this at least once). As well, there are probably _many_ places where the test plan should be set to dirty - but only the 'Save' can clear this (even 'Load'-ing a new test plan might only add to the test plan). Have I understood this correctly ? It doesn't seem to be possible to change test plans without closing down and restarting JMeter. As a side note, would a ThreadGroup be a candidate ? Was it intended that there only be *one* of these per test plan ? (I know that it is possible to have more than one, but this might be an oversight). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
