jorphan [Was: RESOLVED bugs]

[Jordi Salvat i Alabart]

Hi Mike.

I understand why jorphan exists as it is, and it makes sense to me -- it's the kind of stuff that people will keep reinventing until it's somehow added to a Standard Java API.

However, I didn't feel confortable with binaries (compilable from the project sources) existing in CVS. It has actually caused me some damage in the past, when I was trusting ./build.sh would do a clean rebuild and it wasn't the case.

I'm now in the process of doing the changes necessary to make the different sections (jorphan, core, etc.) as independent as possible (as we talked a few weeks ago). Once this is done, I'll also make sure jorphan.lib and all other source-obtainable stuff (e.g. docs) is cleaned up before a clean build.

Makes sense?

Salut,

Jordi.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>