I vote +1 on [VOTE] in the subject
-1 on requirement for one message/one subject/one vote.  I don't see a need to 
specify this and make more email than necessary.  There's only 7 of us - and 
we're all smart.  It's not going to be hard to tally votes or keep track of votable 
issues.

I also wouldn't want to inhibit discussion by requiring [DISCUSSION] in the 
heading, so -1 on that too.

Let's keep it simple and flexible, and fun.  It's important, I think, that involvement 
with JMeter should be enjoyable, not a pain.

-Mike

On 3 Jan 2003 at 16:20, Jordi Salvat i Alabart wrote:

> This is a call for votes on a proposal from Wolfram, ammended by myself:
> 
> That any voting on the jmeter-dev list has to respect the following:
> 
> - A [VOTE] marker is required on both calls for votes and votes.
> - The subject of the message must clearly identify the matter being voted.
> - One single matter per message. One single vote per message.
> - Avoid using he [VOTE] marker for messages not carrying a call for 
> votes or a vote. Use [DISCUSSION] or strip the marker to discuss on the 
> issue being voted.
> 
> Note this implies that if a call for votes carries various proposals 
> (such as this one), the submitter intends to have them voted all in one 
> pack, 'a la Microsoft' :-) If you want to veto only one of them, issue a 
> -1 and issue your alternative call for votes for the remaining.
> 
> Salut,
> 
> Jordi.
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 



--
Michael Stover
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM: mstover_ya
ICQ: 152975688
AIM: mstover777

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to