Hi.
As you may be aware of, I broke the way the JMeter site used to be
published :-(
I still believe the approach of keeping in CVS only things that can't be
obtained from source is cleaner, and better in the long term; but I need
to reinstate a practical way to publish the docs.
Possible ways:
a/ Undo my change and add back the generated docs to CVS
b/ Have the nightly build republish the docs every day
c/ Have the nightly build create a docs distribution, which someone
would need to pull and publish (just as we did when they were in CVS).
d/ �Other ideas?
a/ Has three problems:
1/ As said, needs "redundant" stuff to be kept in CVS. I don't like this
-- although I admit it's a matter of taste.
2/ Requires developers to check-in produced docs in addition to the
source xdocs whenever they make a change. Not a big deal, but it's easy
to forget and may cause conflicts from time to time
3/ It's difficult to verify the content before publishing
b/ is great because it keeps things up-to-date and requires no
invervention, but of course we may occasionally find our site totally
broken.
c/ looks great, but I'm not sure how confortable it will be for whoever
has to do the work -- and we'll make him responsible for the checking,
which is probably unfair.
Anyone can think of a d/ or an e/? Arguments for or against each of the
aproaches?
FYI, most --but not all-- jakarta projects use a/. I don't know exactly
what the others (e.g. jakarta-oro) do.
Salut,
Jordi.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: JMeter site Jordi Salvat i Alabart
- Re: JMeter site Mike Stover
- Re: JMeter site Jordi Salvat i Alabart
- JUnit in binary dist. Jordi Salvat i Alabart
