DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23110>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23110 JDBC Pool not completely cleaned up when in multiple thread groups [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-21 16:40 ------- Do both JDBC queries use the same JDBC URL? My guess is that they do. In this case, I think the current JDBC sampler code will initialize both pools, but it will only use one of them at runtime. And, presumably, only clean up one of them. I've been working on rewriting the JDBC connection pool, but I'm in the middle of travelling and moving, so I won't be able to finish it until probably mid-October. You might want to try a recent nightly build -- the code I've committed recently does fix a couple of issues with the connection pool. But I don't remember right now whether or not this particular problem is fixed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
