En/na BAZLEY, Sebastian ha escrit:
Forgot to add - does java.util.regex have the concept of "matches" as well
as "contains"?
Yes, it does.
If not, "matches" will either have to be coded, or we could remove the functionality - "matches" is tricky, and I'm not sure how useful it is.
S.
-----Original Message-----
From: BAZLEY, Sebastian Sent: 24 November 2003 16:56
To: 'JMeter Developers List'
Subject: RE: ORO or java.util.regex?
I thought we were trying to maintain at least 1.3 compatibility - but I'm happy to go with requiring 1.4.
S. -----Original Message----- From: Jordi Salvat i Alabart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 November 2003 16:50 To: JMeter Developers List Subject: ORO or java.util.regex?
I've found java.util.regex to be much simpler and slightly better performing than the ORO classes for the kind of usage we need.
Any arguments against generally replacing ORO with java.util.regex, now that we are JDK 1.4-dependent anyway?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
