yup sounds good to me.
peter On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:13:16 -0400, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This was my thinking as well. > > -Mike > > > > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 06:23, sebb wrote: > > I'd like to propose at least one further release from the 2.0 branch > > before we release the merged code. > > > > This is for two main reasons: > > - the changes to the HEAD are relatively major (new JMX file save/restore) > > - there have been quite a few fixes to rel-2_0 - some 2.0.1 bugs have > > been reported several times, and it would be useful to get those out > > of the way. > > > > As to releases from the eventual merge of rel-2_0 into HEAD, perhaps > > these should be called 2.1.x? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Sebastian > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Apache Software Foundation > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
