like wise I'm -1 for the change, since it's a lot of work to switch
over. I still haven't had time to try out the subversion plugin for
eclipse. given a choice between being productive and developing or
spending lots of time re-organizing, I prefer to code.

I'm not set in stone or anything, just my own personal preference. I
understand it's a lot of work to maintain the infrastructure, so it's
up to everyone to reach a compromise.

peter


On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:35:36 -0500, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 13:52, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:06:09 -0500, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > My own vote on it was going to be -1, for basically the same reason
> > > everyone else voted +0.  There is just no reason for us to want to move
> > > to subversion.
> > >
> > > But, since we're apparently not being given a choice, I suggest we move
> > > to subversion after finalizing the 2.0 branch.
> >
> > I've got to watch my mouth here :) It's hard to make sure I'm not
> > pressurising or under-reporting an issue when I'm being a middleman.
> >
> > The choice is completely there. I need to reword my aim of getting
> > Jakarta into SVN this quarter to be the more realistic "getting all of
> > Jakarta to consider SVN this quarter". There are some gains on the
> > client-side, and some losses for tightly-focused IDE users (you lose
> > synchronise repository functionality in Eclipse for example).
> 
> Then I will vote -1 on any switch until the subversion clients have at
> least the functionality of the cvs clients.
> 
> >  The
> > Infra guys have much more in the way of gains over losses, so from
> > their point of view it's a much easier choice.
> >
> > That said, if the subcommunity has absolutely no interest in moving,
> > it's a disservice if I make it look as though you're being pushed. I
> > assume the time will come in a year or so when the infrastructure
> > group start talking about wanting to get everyone out of CVS as there
> > are so few left (and CVS is already in a minority), but things can
> > wait until then.
> >
> > I'll start to maintain a list of "Want to stay in CVS for the near
> > future", and the general response on this thread suggests I should put
> > JMeter on it.
> >
> > Hen
> --
> Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Apache Software Foundation
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to