DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35133>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35133 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-31 21:45 ------- Hi Filip, Thanks for your contribution! You are absolutely right about the Thread that isn't being killed in the JMSSampler As I have focused mainly on the Graphical part until now, that (annoying, I can imagine) bug escaped me. Can you elaborate on the test that lead to a message leak? If I look at the changes you made to the MessageAdmin, you made the following changes table.put(id, new PlaceHolder(request)); to synchronized (table) { table.put(id, new PlaceHolder(request)); } PlaceHolder holder = (PlaceHolder)table.get(id); to PlaceHolder holder; synchronized (table) { holder = (PlaceHolder)table.get(id); } As far as I can see, there is no difference in synchronization.... The table is a hashtable which methods are synchronized so they can only be executed by the owner of the lock on the hashtable-object. The same as in your solution. Am I missing anything?? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
