Eliminating the unit tests wouldn't be so easy - the one's under the test/ directory are easy, but there's still a lot done as static inner classes that, IMO, should be moved.
-Mike On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 12:19 +0100, sebb wrote: > I think it would be better to use the Sampler name as the sample > label, and save the junit class + method as the sampler data. > > That way, one can aggregate multiple samples with different class/method > names. > > == > > Also, I'm not sure that many existing JMeter JUnit tests would make > sense to test, so maybe jmeter classes should be excluded from the > list? > > Perhaps better would be to move all the JMeter tests to a separate > source tree and/or separate jar file. This could then be excluded from > the normal binary distribution, as the tests are only really needed by > developers. > > S. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
