the only real reason is that no one bothered to change it. I will change it from "alpha" to normal for the final release of 2.1.
peter On 7/27/05, Sergei Riaguzov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/27/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's been around for a while - I would say it's probably time to start > > using the HttpSampler2 in production settings. > But is it stable? What does it lack to stop being alpha version? > > > If you don't use a listener that stores the response, the response will > > be discarded pretty quick. > I've looked quickly into the code and it seems that HttpSampleResult > or some similar class (I don't remember the name right now) object > which is saved in JMeterThread is then given as a parameter to > notifyListeners() and some other methods. I also found out that there > is always a previous HttpSampleResult saved in threadContext - why? > > All the responseBody is taken by httpMethod.getResponseBody() and then > given as a > parameter to HttpSampleResult.setResponseData() as an array of bytes. > In SizeAssertion the size of the data is checked as this array length. > > And it appears that this bunch of data in HttpSampleResult (this array > of bytes with response) may be providing to memory usage when there > are about 1000 thread downloading a page of 50 Kb simultaniously for > example. > > Do you think that changing it a little may improve memory usage? Maybe > it would make sense to remove all the links to this data as soon as > possible if there's no need in regular expressions checking and > listeners like that? > > > JMeter does not do IP spoofing. > Thanx for the answer. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
