ok, I can apply the first 4 to 2.1 branch and leave the threadlistener performance fix for after 2.1
that sound good to everyone? peter On 8/11/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bugfixes I added were: > > * TCP Sampler not handling sockets properly > * Extract src attribute from embed tags in Jtidy/Html Parsers > > Enhancements: > * Bug 30379 - allow server rmi port to be overridden > * CSVRead allows next as column suffix > > Other (not sure if a bug or not) > * ThreadListener performance fix > > I'd like to get the TCP changes in; I don't mind if the others wait > for the next release. > > WDYT? > > S. > On 11/08/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll have a look this evening - it is probably only 1 or 2; most of > > the changes were enhancements. > > > > S. > > On 11/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > aside from the Sergei submitted what other bug fixes need to be in 2.1? > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > On 8/11/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oops ... I've certainly put some bug fixes into HEAD... > > > > > > > > S. > > > > On 11/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > + on putting the fixes into 2.1 > > > > > > > > > > I can do that tonight if others are busy. > > > > > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > On 8/11/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Why would we include HEAD changes? Clearly they were put there to > > > > > > avoid > > > > > > going out in 2.1 - there'd be *no* other reason to make the changes > > > > > > in > > > > > > HEAD. Let's not start committing the same changes to both branches > > > > > > ala > > > > > > 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > I second putting Sergei's fixes in 2.1 branch before release. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:43 +0100, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > Should we include the recent HEAD changes? > > > > > > > If so, we need to fix the missing component docs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, might be an idea to include the recent fix to redirect/image > > > > > > > download posted by Sergei Riaguzov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > S. > > > > > > > On 10/08/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > when do we want to try for 2.1 release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
