All the 2.0.3 classes now load in JMeter 2.1 including the JDBC configs: I extended the "update.properties" processing. This now allows for some ConfigTestElements which need to change into different classes depending on the associated GUI class. Not as difficult as I thought.
Though of course the code creates separate JDBC config elements for the Pool and DB configs when ideally they should be combined. I've also created screenshots for all the test elements. The Access Log Sampler documentation is a bit out of date - the parsers and filter need to be described - Peter, would you be able to update this? Also the JUnit sampler needs some documentation and a screenshot - please! The nightly build has been updated. S. On 02/09/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IIRC the old sampler had a lot of information in it that is now in the > config elements, so that would need to be included as well. > > Cut and paste between two test elements in the same JMeter instance > would be pretty tedious, given the number of different fields that > there are. > > It would be easier to open two JMeter instances. > > S. > On 02/09/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if we put the DbConfigGui and PoolConfig classes back in, but made > > them "deprecated" and always disabled. That way, people could at least > > load them and copy/paste their info from it to the new element. And do > > something to prevent these element from showing up in dropdowns - some > > sort of isDeprecated method or something like that. > > > > I think that might be easier than trying to do something smarter > > automatically. > > > > -Mike > > > > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 15:15 +0100, sebb wrote: > > > I'm assuming we need to fix the JDBC test plan bug: > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36449 > > > > > > for 2.1.1. > > > > > > I've made some progress on this, but the upgrade.properties changes > > > aren't yet complete - indeed I'm not sure that it can handle the > > > merging of two JDBC config elements. Might need to handle JDBC > > > specially... > > > > > > Anything else vital? > > > > > > S. > > > On 02/09/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Once we get a patched release of 2.1 out, I want to merge the include > > > > controller to the 2.1 branch so that people can use it without jdk1.5. > > > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
