Thanks - we'll certainly try to include it. Eclipse uses Unified, so I for one would prefer that.
You probably know this already, but just in case - please attach the patch file to the bug entry. Patches sent to the list tend to get lost or mangled. S. On 06/09/05, studdugie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. I just joined this mailing list. I'm responding to this post because > I've fixed bug id 33403 and this discussion is about releasing an update for > 2.1 and since I did the fix against the 2.1 source I thought maybe you > (whoever you are) would want to include it in whatever release you decide. > > Now for my retarded newbie question .... What diff output format do you > guys accept? Unified or Context? > > Thanx. > > > On 9/6/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would think within a week or so, depends on what else would be worth > > fixing, plus finding time to do the build, collect votes etc. > > > > By the way, what should it be called? > > > > 2.1.1 or 2.2 or ? > > > > It would be useful to decide that so Bugzilla can be updated in > > advance - should probably get the next version added at the same time. > > > > S. > > On 06/09/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I need to write some graph classes to produce the charts and graphs, so > I > > > thought I might as well extend the aggregate listener. When do we plan > on > > > releasing a new version of 2.1? > > > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
