On 13/01/06, Bill Herndon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The missing file is a saveservice.properties file that doesn't show up
> combined source/lib distributions.  I copied an existing one from an
> older distribution and that was enough to get JMeter to load my test
> plans.  Without that properties file, the JMeter GUI declares the test
> plan invalid and refuses to complete the load.

Ah - that's in the _bin archive. It needs to go into _lib or _src as well.

> As to the second point of your about "terminal paths".  To properly
> handle set-cookie paths (the way the browsers do), the algorithm that
> determines what path to store really needs to trim the path to exclude
> the page itself.  2.1.1 did not do this, but the nightly does, and all I
> was saying was that I noted this when I originally put in my fix for
> missing paths but didn't do any work on it.
>
> Ciao,
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:54 PM
> To: JMeter Developers List
> Subject: Re: JMeter 2.1.2 release?
>
>
> On 12/01/06, Bill Herndon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sebb,
> >
> > The current nightly is in dodgy shape.  Builds OK, but won't load my
> > existing test plans without my copying certain files from one of the
> > release builds.  That said, the set-cookie problem seems to still be
> > there.
>
> Which files?
>
> Remember you need both the _bin and _lib archives.
>
> > After a quick code inspection, it looks to me like the code has been
> > modified to handle removing the terminal page from the stored path.
>
> Don't understand what you are getting at here.
>
> > That's good.  I noted that when I did my set-cookie patch but didn't
> > attack that issue myself.  But... it means that I'll have to redo my
> > patch.  OK, so be it.  I'll try to have the bug filed and the patch
> > submitted by tonight.
> >
> > A quick question though, the Junit's were originally in the
> > CookieManager.java file as a static subclass of TestCase.  Now they're
>
> > gone.  Any idea where they've moved to?  I've six unit's of my own to
> > add to cover the bug.  Looks like there might be some restructuring of
>
> > the testing hierarchy going on.
>
> Yes, there's a test/ hierarchy - quite a few of the tests have been
> moved there.
>
> S.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to