DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38287>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38287 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-23 14:56 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=17487) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17487&action=view) [edit] > This patch targets branch rel-2-1/src, revision 369906 > Thanks for checking. I've not checked everything. > I renew a patch that targets at the branch rel-2-1. As you said, there are not > so much changes. And it is fixed around MultipartUrlConfig.java. > I want to change HTTPArgument constructors because the encoding value is needed > when we use the alreadyEncoded parameter. > I really want to resolve this issue. Please let me know what can I do for it. Sorry, but removing a public constructor is not backwards compatible. A new constructor can be added if required. Likewise, changing the meaning of the 3rd String parameter to addArgument() is not backwards compatible. If necessary, please create a new method. I found it confusing to have a field called "encode" - which sounds like a boolean flag - it would be clearer to me as "encoding". == I'm not entirely clear why it is necessary to have an extra "encoding" field on the HTTPSampler GUI. How do browsers know what encoding to use? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
