DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39447>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39447 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-08 16:52 ------- [BTW, the patch currently fetches the throughput only once. However the thoughput may vary during a run, so this needs to be done every time.] I've done some fixes to the existing code that should make it more accurate. The ramp-up period is now allowed for, and the calculation has been corrected. The original code calculates the delays indepedently for each thread, and tries to maintain the throughput in each thread. The patch tries to maintain the overall thoughput, regardless of which thread generates it. Seems to me that both approaches are valid, so the best might be to add the patch as 2 new options (the per-thread case is now the same). Would that be OK? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
