On 31/08/06, Norbet Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any thoughts on any of the other points raised in this thread:
> > 1. shouldn't .svn/ dirs be included in the download of JMeter src
> > bundle, to ease enhancements and avoid the problem I had where I
> > changed the source before realising no SVN was present (at which stage
> > it is not easy to work out what you changed)?
>
> Adding .svn directories to the source archive would be a nuisance for
> most people, and could double the size of the archive. If you want
> these, it's best to download directly from SVN.
>
Fair enough, my bad due to not being familiar with the protocol. My
expectation was that I would be able to enhance the downloaded source
and then commit, and as I didn't notice there were no .svn dirs I
ended up having to manually move my changes over to a working dir that
I later checked out from SVN.
I'll remember to start with a check-out from SVN when/if making
enhancements in the future.
Not sure that is necessary - patches can just be created as diffs
against the original source. The SVN directories are not needed for
this.
> I don't understand why having the .svn directories in the source
> archive would make it any easier to submit enhancements.
>
> > 2. I presume I should open new bugzilla issues for the two LDAP
> > GUI problems I noted earlier.
>
> Please.
>
Opened
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40369
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40370
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40371
Thanks
wasn't sure about exact severity/priority of last two (ie whether
relative to LDAP component or whole system etc etc), please adjust as
appropriate.
OK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
